<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kevin Purdy &#187; Lost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepurdman.com/tag/lost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepurdman.com</link>
	<description>Technology, Food, and Other Freelance Nonsense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:54:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New productivity challenge: Ensemble drama clutter</title>
		<link>http://thepurdman.com/new-productivity-challenge-ensemble-drama-clutter/</link>
		<comments>http://thepurdman.com/new-productivity-challenge-ensemble-drama-clutter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Purdy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepurdman.com/2007/09/25/new-productivity-challenge-ensemble-drama-clutter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slate posted an insightful article Friday looking at the latest move by networks to retain the kind of big, multi-demographic audiences they once took for granted. The short version is that dramas with big, big casts — Heroes, Grey&#8217;s Anatomy, Lost, almost every recent HBO series and, yes, even this blogger&#8217;s all-time favorite, The Wire, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.slate.com" target="_blank">Slate</a> posted <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2174388/" target="_blank">an insightful article</a> Friday looking at the latest move by networks to retain the kind of big, multi-demographic audiences they once took for granted. The short version is that dramas with big, big casts — <em>Heroes</em>,<em> Grey&#8217;s Anatomy</em>,<em> Lost</em>, almost every recent HBO series and, yes, even this blogger&#8217;s all-time favorite, <em>The Wire</em>, get mentions<em> </em>— are a triple threat of viewer retention:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Smorgasboard of relatability: </strong>The odds are stacked against even the most cynical of TV critics to not find somebody to like. Even if, like me, you stopped caring about <em>Lost</em>&#8216;s Jack/Kate/Sawyer triangular affair 10 episodes ago, you&#8217;ve got at least <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke_%28Lost%29" target="_blank">two</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desmond_Hume" target="_blank">more</a> noble/tragic heroes, couples like Jin and Sun or Claire and Charlie to empathize with/root for, and lots of peripheral conflicts.</li>
<li><strong>Logistical safety net: </strong>If <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masi_Oka" target="_blank">Masi Oka</a> suddenly feels like his salary needs a 300% upgrade (not that he <a href="http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2006/10/71984" target="_blank">seems like that type</a>, just as a what-if) and NBC disagreed, <em>Heroes</em> wouldn&#8217;t necessarily be ruined. Writers have lots of other characters and plotlines to both shift the weight onto and use to explain the disappearance of said ornery instigator.</li>
<li><strong>Corpses give good water cooler: </strong>Need a sure-fire way to get TV guide, Entertainment Weekly and TV-savvy blogs all atwitter about your series? Off a character nobody expects to go, or maybe perform some Darwinian cast adjustment by showing less-liked figures out with a somber burial scene.</li>
</ul>
<p>But, as Slate points out, only a few shows are agile enough to make shows with big casts feel like big drama instead of thinned-out soap operas.</p>
<p>Nearly all of the women I live and work with have expressed dismay at how <em>Grey&#8217;s</em> got a little too &#8220;shocking development&#8221; for its own good. If you constantly toy with and reinvent every single character with unexpected negative traits, who does that leave to empathize with or, well, like?</p>
<p>How <em>The Wire</em> pulls this off is its own post, but I&#8217;ll say quickly that while the series benefits as a whole from long character development arcs, each episode can stand as a self-sustained entity against a clearly-drawn Baltimore backdrop.</p>
<p>Watching <em>Lost</em>, however, has occasionally felt like trying to find a file piled somewhere in the corner of a mountainous desk. I find myself forgetting entire aspects of characters that haven&#8217;t been brought to the fore in a while, or else questioning why characters are acting so strangely (&#8220;Wait, why is Hurley suddenly fine with The Numbers, but used to be crazy-scared of &#8216;the curse&#8217; before?&#8221;). Trying to reconcile those kinds of thoughts in my head while the show plays, of course, somewhat lessens the sheer sense of fun I found early in the series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepurdman.com/new-productivity-challenge-ensemble-drama-clutter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

