<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kevin Purdy &#187; analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepurdman.com/tag/analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepurdman.com</link>
	<description>Technology, food, and other freelance nonsense.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:00:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8220;That&#8217;s Got His Own&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://thepurdman.com/thats-got-his-own/</link>
		<comments>http://thepurdman.com/thats-got-his-own/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Purdy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepurdman.com/2008/01/08/thats-got-his-own/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8220;We got our thing, but it&#8217;s just part of the big thing.&#8221; &#8211; Zenobia
If you&#8217;ve spoken to me recently, or if you&#8217;re one of about six people I forced to read my last post on my defunct first blog attempt, you know that Sunday night was a pretty frickin&#8217; huge event for me.
The last season [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZefpVE2U350&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xd6d6d6&amp;color2=0xf0f0f0&amp;border=0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZefpVE2U350&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xd6d6d6&amp;color2=0xf0f0f0&amp;border=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object><br />
<em><font size="2">&#8220;We got our thing, but it&#8217;s just part of the big thing.&#8221; &#8211; Zenobia</font></em></p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve spoken to me recently, or if you&#8217;re one of about six people I forced to read my <a href="http://therevan.blogspot.com/2007/06/5-reasons-i-would-give-up-my-cell-phone.html">last post on my defunct first blog attempt</a>, you know that Sunday night was a pretty frickin&#8217; huge event for me.</p>
<p>The last season of the best television project I&#8217;ve ever seen,  <a href="http://www.hbo.com/thewire/"><em>The Wire</em></a>, started its run, leaving me both fulfilled and really, actually <em>nervous</em> about how the last chapter will play out, how it will integrate a topic—journalism and its discontents—near and dear to my heart, and how it will affect the show&#8217;s legacy.</p>
<p>I <strike>say</strike> write &#8220;chapter&#8221; intentionally, because, as <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22the+wire%22+%22televised+novel%22&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a">umpteen pundits have pointed out</a>, the show is more &#8220;televised novel&#8221; than &#8220;Dramatic Series&#8221; (or whatever category the Emmys have UTTERLY SNUBBED it in). I write &#8220;legacy&#8221; intentionally because I&#8217;m all too aware that the show pulls <a href="http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:W4fzwuErzAUJ:www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/10/22/071022fa_fact_talbot%3FcurrentPage%3Dall+site:newyorker.com+%224.4+million%22&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=1&amp;gl=us&amp;client=firefox-a">fewer viewers</a> right now than even a modest hit like &#8220;Big Love,&#8221; so its best chance of actual impact lies in that new kind of never-ending memorial service known as a DVD boxed set.</p>
<p>But blah blah &#8220;What the show means&#8221; and yada yada &#8220;Where is this season headed?&#8221; (for that kind of thing—but good—bookmark Slate&#8217;s <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2181449/entry/2181450/">TV Club</a> for this season). Here&#8217;s just a few take-aways, good and bad.</p>
<h3>The Good</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Bunk</strong>—The first shot of the first scene of the first episode is a long, multi-line mind-f#$% by homicide Detective <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunk_Moreland">William &#8220;Bunk&#8221; Moreland</a> on a gullible murder suspect, and it&#8217;s a great &#8220;welcome back&#8221; for long-time fans. The man just carries any scene he&#8217;s in, bringing menace, mirth and wisdom to moments like this.</li>
<li><strong>Bubbs</strong>—Nobody can envy Andre Royo&#8217;s lot in this season, as he takes <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bubbles_%28The_Wire%29">Bubbles/&#8221;Bubbs&#8221;</a> down the well-worn &#8220;recovering addict&#8221; path. This being <em>The Wire</em> though, you know he&#8217;s going on his own, with no system to catch and comfort him, and that even if he keeps clean, there might not be a great life waiting for him—kinda realistic, you&#8217;d have to imagine.</li>
<li><strong>The Humor</strong>—I&#8217;d never watched &#8220;The Wire&#8221; with more than one person until last night, when I hosted a low-key &#8220;Season Five Party&#8221; at my place for two other couples. Yes, we are all white and middle-class, and yes, I scolded myself many times for throwing a &#8220;party&#8221; for a show depicting the utter abandonment of the predominantly black, overwhelmingly poor American City. Yet watching the show in a group made me realize how skillfully little moments of humor are woven into what would otherwise seem like a daramtized <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Zinn">Howard Zinn</a> tale, with swearing. The opening scene drew five laughs, some in disbelief. A later scene, when a politician sees their face under a gotcha headline and mouths her discontent, brought the whole room up in &#8220;Ohhhh!&#8221;s. And the little moments of gritty truth the show is sprinkled are way more fun to smirk and nose-breathe at with a crowd.</li>
<li><strong>The One True Newspaper Moment</strong>—Critics seem to be lining up evenly on both sides of how realistic or human the characters in this season&#8217;s pseudo-Baltimore Sun are. The language and overall tone, however, seem right on.  I&#8217;ve only had a bit more than five years&#8217; experience in the newspaper trade, but there&#8217;s one moment involving an executive editor back-handedly spiking a story—using a sentence that starts off with, &#8220;I was talking with [name] at [institution] the other day, and &#8230;&#8221; that rings all too true, from my own recollections and coffee break tales I&#8217;ve heard.</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Bad</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Those Other Newspaper Moments</strong>—At this early point in the season, I&#8217;m a bit wary of how rootsy and truth-seeking they&#8217;ve made the obvious hero, City Editor Augustus &#8220;Gus&#8221; Haynes, and how blatantly clueless his higher-ups come across. And if you know anything about David Simon&#8217;s <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200801/bowden-wire">decades-spanning beef</a> with his former editors at the Baltimore Sun, you know that well goes much, much deeper—maybe a whole season&#8217;s worth. Then again, I might be a bit too familiar with it to really see it, and I suppose Burrell and Rawls likewise came across as Skeletor and Megatron, at first.</li>
<li><strong>The Electric Piano Borrowed from &#8220;Law &amp; Order&#8221; in the New Theme</strong>—See clip above. I love Steve Earle, but the new opening credits track makes me think someone&#8217;s always going to get done right before the commercials at 32 minutes.</li>
<li><strong>No Omar</strong>—I used to fall in with the crowd who thought Omar should have been dead about 20 episodes ago. After the wait between season four and five, however, I just want the duster-wearing, shotgun-toting, Deus-Ex-Machina-serving man back in the game</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;m going to try this again after next week&#8217;s episode, hopefully in a more timely fashion (thanks, On Demand!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepurdman.com/thats-got-his-own/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europeans and Americans think different (no, seriously) about Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://thepurdman.com/europeans-and-americans-think-different-no-seriously-about-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://thepurdman.com/europeans-and-americans-think-different-no-seriously-about-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Purdy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepurdman.com/2007/09/27/europeans-and-americans-think-different-no-seriously-about-microsoft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
How come the kid representing Linux has the unkempt hair?
To say the least, Microsoft&#8217;s varied efforts at stonewalling or segmenting the Linux market have gotten markedly different receptions in the U.S. and Europe.
Take, for example, this report in the Sept. 20 issue of The Economist, which summarizes the findings by a trial court for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://thepurdman.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/economist_microsoft_illustration1.jpg" alt="Illustration from The Economist" border="0" /><br />
<em><font size="2">How come the kid representing Linux has the unkempt hair?</font></em></p>
<p>To say the least, Microsoft&#8217;s varied efforts at stonewalling or segmenting the Linux market have gotten markedly different receptions in the U.S. and Europe.</p>
<p>Take, for example, <a href="http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9832868&amp;CFID=21128925&amp;CFTOKEN=80898931" target="_blank">this report</a> in the Sept. 20 issue of The Economist, which summarizes the findings by a trial court for the European Union in upholding an antitrust ruling against Microsoft:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>(The EU) argued, for instance, that withholding information that is needed for <span class="scaps">PC</span>s and servers to work together constitutes an abuse of a dominant position if it keeps others from developing rival software for which there is potential consumer demand. In such cases, the information cannot be refused even if it is protected by intellectual-property rights, as Microsoft had argued.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, because Microsoft&#8217;s utter domination of the business desktop market has led it to stonewall efforts by non-Microsoft server suppliers to play nice, the EU could force the Redmond giant to hand over the source code for Windows.</p>
<p>Over here in the U.S., it&#8217;s, well, different. The networking company Novell, which announced in November 2006 that it would partner with Microsoft to make its own Linux products play nice, <a href="http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index.php/id;63055845" target="_blank">is apparently glad it did so</a>, to the tune of a 250% jump in business. [Link via <a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/27/1239251" target="_blank">/.</a>]</p>
<blockquote><p><em>[Novell director of marketing Justin Steinman] said part of its growth was directly related to the Microsoft deal, adding that Novell has billed more than US$100 million in business through its Microsoft relationship. He added that the growth was also due to the halo effect of the arrangement.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Sounds great for Novell. Note, however, that Microsoft agreed to give away a total of $240 million in vouchers for Novell-provided support as part of the deal, and Novell has cashed in 44 percent of them, according to <a href="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=ECC014ED-A007-4879-9D81-E78F756F7A37" target="_blank">Computer Business Review</a> &#8212; coincidentally, that&#8217;s about $105 million.</p>
<p>Regardless of whose books the boost is recorded on, it&#8217;s interesting to see how Microsoft&#8217;s firm stance on &#8220;inter-operability&#8221; generates source code demands in Europe, but invoices in the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepurdman.com/europeans-and-americans-think-different-no-seriously-about-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New productivity challenge: Ensemble drama clutter</title>
		<link>http://thepurdman.com/new-productivity-challenge-ensemble-drama-clutter/</link>
		<comments>http://thepurdman.com/new-productivity-challenge-ensemble-drama-clutter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Purdy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepurdman.com/2007/09/25/new-productivity-challenge-ensemble-drama-clutter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slate posted an insightful article Friday looking at the latest move by networks to retain the kind of big, multi-demographic audiences they once took for granted. The short version is that dramas with big, big casts — Heroes, Grey&#8217;s Anatomy, Lost, almost every recent HBO series and, yes, even this blogger&#8217;s all-time favorite, The Wire, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.slate.com" target="_blank">Slate</a> posted <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2174388/" target="_blank">an insightful article</a> Friday looking at the latest move by networks to retain the kind of big, multi-demographic audiences they once took for granted. The short version is that dramas with big, big casts — <em>Heroes</em>,<em> Grey&#8217;s Anatomy</em>,<em> Lost</em>, almost every recent HBO series and, yes, even this blogger&#8217;s all-time favorite, <em>The Wire</em>, get mentions<em> </em>— are a triple threat of viewer retention:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Smorgasboard of relatability: </strong>The odds are stacked against even the most cynical of TV critics to not find somebody to like. Even if, like me, you stopped caring about <em>Lost</em>&#8217;s Jack/Kate/Sawyer triangular affair 10 episodes ago, you&#8217;ve got at least <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke_%28Lost%29" target="_blank">two</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desmond_Hume" target="_blank">more</a> noble/tragic heroes, couples like Jin and Sun or Claire and Charlie to empathize with/root for, and lots of peripheral conflicts.</li>
<li><strong>Logistical safety net: </strong>If <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masi_Oka" target="_blank">Masi Oka</a> suddenly feels like his salary needs a 300% upgrade (not that he <a href="http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2006/10/71984" target="_blank">seems like that type</a>, just as a what-if) and NBC disagreed, <em>Heroes</em> wouldn&#8217;t necessarily be ruined. Writers have lots of other characters and plotlines to both shift the weight onto and use to explain the disappearance of said ornery instigator.</li>
<li><strong>Corpses give good water cooler: </strong>Need a sure-fire way to get TV guide, Entertainment Weekly and TV-savvy blogs all atwitter about your series? Off a character nobody expects to go, or maybe perform some Darwinian cast adjustment by showing less-liked figures out with a somber burial scene.</li>
</ul>
<p>But, as Slate points out, only a few shows are agile enough to make shows with big casts feel like big drama instead of thinned-out soap operas.</p>
<p>Nearly all of the women I live and work with have expressed dismay at how <em>Grey&#8217;s</em> got a little too &#8220;shocking development&#8221; for its own good. If you constantly toy with and reinvent every single character with unexpected negative traits, who does that leave to empathize with or, well, like?</p>
<p>How <em>The Wire</em> pulls this off is its own post, but I&#8217;ll say quickly that while the series benefits as a whole from long character development arcs, each episode can stand as a self-sustained entity against a clearly-drawn Baltimore backdrop.</p>
<p>Watching <em>Lost</em>, however, has occasionally felt like trying to find a file piled somewhere in the corner of a mountainous desk. I find myself forgetting entire aspects of characters that haven&#8217;t been brought to the fore in a while, or else questioning why characters are acting so strangely (&#8221;Wait, why is Hurley suddenly fine with The Numbers, but used to be crazy-scared of &#8216;the curse&#8217; before?&#8221;). Trying to reconcile those kinds of thoughts in my head while the show plays, of course, somewhat lessens the sheer sense of fun I found early in the series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepurdman.com/new-productivity-challenge-ensemble-drama-clutter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
